<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href="http://www.blogger.com/styles/atom.css" type="text/css"?><feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/'><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.comments</id><updated>2012-06-01T21:45:12.674+02:00</updated><category term='Recours'/><category term='EQF'/><category term='Nouveauté'/><category term='unité d&apos;invention'/><category term='Lectures et films'/><category term='Offre d&apos;emploi'/><category term='Taxes'/><category term='divisionnaire'/><category term='délai'/><category term='JO'/><category term='EPLA'/><category term='Brevet communautaire'/><category term='Correction d&apos;erreurs'/><category term='Procédure orale'/><category term='CBE 2000'/><category term='Biotechnologie'/><category term='Priorité'/><category term='Insuffisance de description'/><category term='fusion CPI-avocats'/><category term='Art 123(3)'/><category term='Disclaimers'/><category term='Brevet unitaire'/><category term='Directive 2004/48'/><category term='Usage antérieur'/><category term='Support'/><category term='Statistiques'/><category term='restitutio in integrum'/><category term='Invention de la semaine'/><category term='Juridiction unifiée'/><category term='activité inventive'/><category term='CEIPI'/><category term='législation française'/><category term='EQE'/><category term='thérapie'/><category term='intervention'/><category term='Requête en révision'/><category term='Jurisprudence communautaire'/><category term='clarté'/><category term='Art 123(2)'/><category term='Grande Chambre'/><category term='CBE'/><category term='Protocole de Londres'/><category term='récusation'/><category term='CCP'/><title type='text'>Le Blog du Droit Européen des Brevets</title><link rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#feed' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/feeds/comments/default'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/comments/default'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/'/><link rel='hub' href='http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/'/><link rel='next' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/comments/default?start-index=26&amp;max-results=25'/><author><name>Laurent Teyssèdre</name><uri>https://profiles.google.com/113131470664004165852</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='32' height='32' src='//lh4.googleusercontent.com/-xHIgQghHpNQ/AAAAAAAAAAI/AAAAAAAAAp8/52j8NQ0yW0c/s512-c/photo.jpg'/></author><generator version='7.00' uri='http://www.blogger.com'>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>2386</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-2635477106161933798</id><published>2012-06-01T12:52:20.949+02:00</published><updated>2012-06-01T12:52:20.949+02:00</updated><title type='text'>protéger les cyclistes contre les morsures de requ...</title><summary type='text'>protéger les cyclistes contre les morsures de requins????&lt;br /&gt;Y a que les américains pour faire du vélo dans la mer (des caraïbes).</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/6740412978883492169/comments/default/2635477106161933798'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/6740412978883492169/comments/default/2635477106161933798'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/06/linvention-de-la-semaine.html?showComment=1338547940949#c2635477106161933798' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/06/linvention-de-la-semaine.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-6740412978883492169' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/6740412978883492169' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-550704272'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='1 juin 2012 12:52'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4659909751794753296</id><published>2012-05-29T11:34:21.419+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-29T11:34:21.419+02:00</updated><title type='text'>La remarque est intéressante.

Mais je crois que l...</title><summary type='text'>La remarque est intéressante.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mais je crois que la situation est très claire :&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Si la chambre a décidé de tuer le brevet, elle utilise ce qui l&amp;#39;arrange pour interpréter la revendication de la manière la plus large possible.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Donc si la description donne un sens plus étroit que celui communément admis (T197/10), elle ne prend pas en compte la description; si au </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4982348763625088608/comments/default/4659909751794753296'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4982348763625088608/comments/default/4659909751794753296'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t62008-attention-aux-definitions-larges.html?showComment=1338284061419#c4659909751794753296' title=''/><link rel='related' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4982348763625088608/comments/default/7148206333945664923'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t62008-attention-aux-definitions-larges.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4982348763625088608' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4982348763625088608' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1574587359'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='29 mai 2012 11:34'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-7148206333945664923</id><published>2012-05-29T10:49:21.034+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-29T10:49:21.034+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Je ne suis pas chimiste, mais &amp;quot;amino&amp;quot; es...</title><summary type='text'>Je ne suis pas chimiste, mais &amp;quot;amino&amp;quot; est il un terme &amp;quot;ambigu&amp;quot;? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Car j&amp;#39;ai retenu de T197/10 que si un terme n&amp;#39;est pas ambigu, on ne doit pas s&amp;#39;aider de la description pour le comprendre : lorsque les revendications sont claires et non ambiguës, de sorte que l&amp;#39;homme du métier peut les comprendre, il n&amp;#39;y a pas de raison d&amp;#39;utiliser la </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4982348763625088608/comments/default/7148206333945664923'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4982348763625088608/comments/default/7148206333945664923'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t62008-attention-aux-definitions-larges.html?showComment=1338281361034#c7148206333945664923' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t62008-attention-aux-definitions-larges.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4982348763625088608' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4982348763625088608' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-550704272'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='29 mai 2012 10:49'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-172194792872935904</id><published>2012-05-29T09:04:48.584+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-29T09:04:48.584+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Intéressant, en effet.
Merci Laurent.</title><summary type='text'>Intéressant, en effet.&lt;br /&gt;Merci Laurent.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4982348763625088608/comments/default/172194792872935904'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4982348763625088608/comments/default/172194792872935904'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t62008-attention-aux-definitions-larges.html?showComment=1338275088584#c172194792872935904' title=''/><author><name>Rimbaud</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t62008-attention-aux-definitions-larges.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4982348763625088608' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4982348763625088608' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-875357747'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='29 mai 2012 09:04'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-5768918324475953432</id><published>2012-05-28T06:56:03.183+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-28T06:56:03.183+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Curieux... Le demandeur est coréen, mais la demand...</title><summary type='text'>Curieux... Le demandeur est coréen, mais la demande a été déposée auprès de RO/NL. (La nationalité du mandataire, situé à Amsterdam, ne compte pas). L&amp;#39;office NL aurait dû, s&amp;#39;il aait suivi les dispositions du PCT, faire suivre la demande à IB, qui l&amp;#39;aurait à son tour transmise à l&amp;#39;office compétent, ISA/KR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Je note aussi l&amp;#39;embonpoint pris par le dossier: le mémoire </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4002081756431739378/comments/default/5768918324475953432'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4002081756431739378/comments/default/5768918324475953432'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/j410-pas-de-preuve-du-transfert.html?showComment=1338180963183#c5768918324475953432' title=''/><author><name>Roufousse T. Fairfly</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/j410-pas-de-preuve-du-transfert.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4002081756431739378' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4002081756431739378' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1224494353'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='28 mai 2012 06:56'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-2018312404981233179</id><published>2012-05-25T15:22:18.451+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-25T15:22:18.451+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Effectivement.... je n&amp;#39;avais pas lu ces passag...</title><summary type='text'>Effectivement.... je n&amp;#39;avais pas lu ces passages. C&amp;#39;était juste une réaction à &amp;quot;chaud&amp;quot;. Dans le cas d&amp;#39;espèce, ça pourrait effectivement coincer aussi avec ce libellé... par contre, si le matériau avait eu une action thérapeutique, je pense que ça aurait été bon alors...</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/2018312404981233179'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/2018312404981233179'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html?showComment=1337952138451#c2018312404981233179' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-441585459681774847' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/441585459681774847' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1526343550'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='25 mai 2012 15:22'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4917958035659365410</id><published>2012-05-25T13:15:10.563+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-25T13:15:10.563+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Je fais un copier coller du communiqué du G8, trou...</title><summary type='text'>Je fais un copier coller du communiqué du G8, trouvé sur le site des echos&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1. We, the Leaders of the Group of Eight, met at Camp David on May 18 and 19, 2012 to address major global economic and political challenges.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The Global Economy&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;9. Given the importance of intellectual property rights (IPR) to stimulating job and economic growth, we affirm the </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4069329861598974028/comments/default/4917958035659365410'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4069329861598974028/comments/default/4917958035659365410'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2011/12/brevet-unitaire-et-juridiction-unique.html?showComment=1337944510563#c4917958035659365410' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2011/12/brevet-unitaire-et-juridiction-unique.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4069329861598974028' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4069329861598974028' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-711384035'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='25 mai 2012 13:15'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-1587225572844074024</id><published>2012-05-25T08:35:43.743+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-25T08:35:43.743+02:00</updated><title type='text'>j&amp;#39;ai juste un doute pour votre revendication, ...</title><summary type='text'>j&amp;#39;ai juste un doute pour votre revendication, par rapport à ce qui est dit au paragraphes 4.2 et 4.3 de la décision et notamment: &amp;quot;ledit effet thérapeutique ne peut pas provenir en l&amp;#39;espèce de la nature dudit matériau. Au contraire, comme reconnu par la requérante elle-même, il dépend de la géométrie et du positionnement de la bandelette.&amp;quot; Ce que j&amp;#39;interprète (peut </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/1587225572844074024'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/1587225572844074024'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html?showComment=1337927743743#c1587225572844074024' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-441585459681774847' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/441585459681774847' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-482622911'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='25 mai 2012 08:35'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-2368362270357871843</id><published>2012-05-24T09:56:56.504+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-24T09:56:56.504+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Quid alors d&amp;#39;une revendication du type : 
Maté...</title><summary type='text'>Quid alors d&amp;#39;une revendication du type : &lt;br /&gt;Matériau biocompatible (ie Polypropylène) pour une utilisation sous forme de bandelette pour traiter l&amp;#39;incontinence urinaire &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Pour moi, c&amp;#39;est bon.... et sur le fond, ça ne change pas grand chose quant à la portée... Me trompe-je ?</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/2368362270357871843'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/2368362270357871843'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html?showComment=1337846216504#c2368362270357871843' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-441585459681774847' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/441585459681774847' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1526343550'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='24 mai 2012 09:56'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4051463865398400857</id><published>2012-05-24T09:04:19.055+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-24T09:04:19.055+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Je trouve cette décision très intéressante car j&amp;#...</title><summary type='text'>Je trouve cette décision très intéressante car j&amp;#39;ai déjà eu à me poser la question suite au terme &amp;quot;notamment&amp;quot; dans l&amp;#39;article 53c.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/4051463865398400857'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/4051463865398400857'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html?showComment=1337843059055#c4051463865398400857' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-441585459681774847' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/441585459681774847' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-482622911'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='24 mai 2012 09:04'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-3197319191680538473</id><published>2012-05-23T13:31:41.742+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-23T13:31:41.742+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Hommage prémonitoire à . Eugene J. Polley?</title><summary type='text'>Hommage prémonitoire à . Eugene J. Polley?</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/1561740340835917833/comments/default/3197319191680538473'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/1561740340835917833/comments/default/3197319191680538473'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/linvention-de-la-semaine_18.html?showComment=1337772701742#c3197319191680538473' title=''/><author><name>ingénieur</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/18025758626761609973</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/linvention-de-la-semaine_18.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-1561740340835917833' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/1561740340835917833' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1935139630'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='23 mai 2012 13:31'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-7570859334917624664</id><published>2012-05-23T12:14:10.887+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-23T12:14:10.887+02:00</updated><title type='text'>on verra l&amp;#39;examiners report de l&amp;#39;épreuve C...</title><summary type='text'>on verra l&amp;#39;examiners report de l&amp;#39;épreuve C 2012 : c&amp;#39;était sur des patchs...</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/7570859334917624664'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/7570859334917624664'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html?showComment=1337768050887#c7570859334917624664' title=''/><link rel='related' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/8846644901641269070'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-441585459681774847' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/441585459681774847' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-550704272'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='23 mai 2012 12:14'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-5127532511022880092</id><published>2012-05-23T09:58:14.189+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-23T09:58:14.189+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Je dirais que non. C&amp;#39;est le support d&amp;#39;une ...</title><summary type='text'>Je dirais que non. C&amp;#39;est le support d&amp;#39;une composition.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/5127532511022880092'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/5127532511022880092'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html?showComment=1337759894189#c5127532511022880092' title=''/><link rel='related' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/8846644901641269070'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-441585459681774847' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/441585459681774847' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-877933664'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='23 mai 2012 09:58'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-8846644901641269070</id><published>2012-05-23T09:37:18.837+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-23T09:37:18.837+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Et un patch, c&amp;#39;est une composition?</title><summary type='text'>Et un patch, c&amp;#39;est une composition?</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/8846644901641269070'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/441585459681774847/comments/default/8846644901641269070'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html?showComment=1337758638837#c8846644901641269070' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t109909-une-bandelette-nest-pas-une.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-441585459681774847' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/441585459681774847' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-172396598'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='23 mai 2012 09:37'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-450173028649992806</id><published>2012-05-18T08:58:09.043+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-18T08:58:09.043+02:00</updated><title type='text'>J&amp;#39;ai jeté un coup d&amp;#39;oeil aux documents men...</title><summary type='text'>J&amp;#39;ai jeté un coup d&amp;#39;oeil aux documents mentionnés sur la page couverture, en m&amp;#39;attendant y trouver des commandes d&amp;#39;autoradios montés dans le coffre par des flexibles (circa 1935) ou du matériel de transmission d&amp;#39;aéronef ou de véhicule militaire.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;J&amp;#39;ai été étonné de retrouver deux bonnes antériorité (opposées par l&amp;#39;examinateur?).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Outre un document </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/1561740340835917833/comments/default/450173028649992806'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/1561740340835917833/comments/default/450173028649992806'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/linvention-de-la-semaine_18.html?showComment=1337324289043#c450173028649992806' title=''/><author><name>Roufousse T. Fairfly</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/linvention-de-la-semaine_18.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-1561740340835917833' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/1561740340835917833' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1224494353'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='18 mai 2012 08:58'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-7519880533539461749</id><published>2012-05-16T17:26:29.362+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-16T17:26:29.362+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Une chose est sûre : le crû n&amp;#39;était pas mauvai...</title><summary type='text'>Une chose est sûre : le crû n&amp;#39;était pas mauvais cette année. Il faut souligner qu&amp;#39;un tuteur de l&amp;#39;EQE (et EPA) avait préalablement publié des résultats avec 5 incertitudes sur 4 questions (et cela après avoir consulté d&amp;#39;autres EPA de son cabinet...)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://pre-exam.blogspot.fr/2012/03/pre-exam-2012-our-thoughts-and.html</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4855540191312656294/comments/default/7519880533539461749'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4855540191312656294/comments/default/7519880533539461749'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/visioconference-pre-eqe.html?showComment=1337181989362#c7519880533539461749' title=''/><author><name>Eric</name><uri>http://www.blogger.com/profile/16999697979829874484</uri><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img2.blogblog.com/img/b16-rounded.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/visioconference-pre-eqe.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4855540191312656294' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4855540191312656294' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-437511127'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='16 mai 2012 17:26'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-7983572595046073</id><published>2012-05-16T11:18:02.497+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-16T11:18:02.497+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Sur la question subsidiaire : l&amp;#39;effet obtenu n...</title><summary type='text'>Sur la question subsidiaire : l&amp;#39;effet obtenu ne figure pas dans la revendication. L&amp;#39;Art 83 peut être utilisé si l&amp;#39;homme du métier ne savait pas fabriquer le matériau, mais pas simplement parce que l&amp;#39;effet n&amp;#39;est pas obtenu.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;En opposition, le fait que l&amp;#39;effet ne soit pas obtenu dans toute la portée peut être utilisé pour l&amp;#39;activité inventive, en forçant à </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/6846820885799833387/comments/default/7983572595046073'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/6846820885799833387/comments/default/7983572595046073'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t148608-trop-large.html?showComment=1337159882497#c7983572595046073' title=''/><link rel='related' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/6846820885799833387/comments/default/307543798606610983'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t148608-trop-large.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-6846820885799833387' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/6846820885799833387' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1574587359'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='16 mai 2012 11:18'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-918590647443908501</id><published>2012-05-16T11:11:20.053+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-16T11:11:20.053+02:00</updated><title type='text'>&lt;i&gt;...mais lorsque cette démonstration est apporté...</title><summary type='text'>&lt;i&gt;...mais lorsque cette démonstration est apportée pour une partie de la revendication, comme c&amp;#39;est le cas d&amp;#39;espèce, il appartient alors à l&amp;#39;OEB &lt;b&gt;ou à un opposant&lt;/b&gt; d&amp;#39;exprimer des doutes sérieux sur le fait que les données présentées ne pourraient pas être extrapolées à l&amp;#39;ensemble de la revendication.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cette décision est encore une fois l&amp;#39;</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/6846820885799833387/comments/default/918590647443908501'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/6846820885799833387/comments/default/918590647443908501'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t148608-trop-large.html?showComment=1337159480053#c918590647443908501' title=''/><link rel='related' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/6846820885799833387/comments/default/307543798606610983'/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t148608-trop-large.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-6846820885799833387' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/6846820885799833387' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-920058554'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='16 mai 2012 11:11'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-307543798606610983</id><published>2012-05-16T09:39:01.472+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-16T09:39:01.472+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Cette application des dispositions de l&amp;#39;Art. 8...</title><summary type='text'>Cette application des dispositions de l&amp;#39;Art. 84 CBE me semble très sévère, et ne pas refléter la vue de toutes les chambres de recours à ce sujet.&lt;br /&gt;Il doit en effet être à la charge du demandeur de prouver qu&amp;#39;une revendication est totalement supportée par la description, mais lorsque cette démonstration est apportée pour une partie de la revendication, comme c&amp;#39;est le cas d&amp;#39;</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/6846820885799833387/comments/default/307543798606610983'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/6846820885799833387/comments/default/307543798606610983'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t148608-trop-large.html?showComment=1337153941472#c307543798606610983' title=''/><author><name>Lyonnais</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/t148608-trop-large.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-6846820885799833387' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/6846820885799833387' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-236718709'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='16 mai 2012 09:39'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-6360001369689160851</id><published>2012-05-16T08:09:13.680+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-16T08:09:13.680+02:00</updated><title type='text'>J&amp;#39;ai déjà fait une procédure orale par visioco...</title><summary type='text'>J&amp;#39;ai déjà fait une procédure orale par visioconférence, je trouve que c&amp;#39;est plutôt pratique et que l&amp;#39;on ne perd pas grand chose à en faire ainsi, même si c&amp;#39;est toujours mieux d&amp;#39;être de visu. A mon avis, pour un dossier très stratégique, on a quand-même intérêt à être face à la division d&amp;#39;examen, mais pour tous les autres dossiers, c&amp;#39;est beaucoup plus simple et plus </summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4855540191312656294/comments/default/6360001369689160851'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4855540191312656294/comments/default/6360001369689160851'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/visioconference-pre-eqe.html?showComment=1337148553680#c6360001369689160851' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/visioconference-pre-eqe.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4855540191312656294' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4855540191312656294' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-871413799'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='16 mai 2012 08:09'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-358684991751226303</id><published>2012-05-14T10:52:54.073+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-14T10:52:54.073+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Vu le taux de succès, c&amp;#39;est un très bon cru, e...</title><summary type='text'>Vu le taux de succès, c&amp;#39;est un très bon cru, et on peut s&amp;#39;attendre à un taux de réussite record à l&amp;#39;EQE 2013.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4855540191312656294/comments/default/358684991751226303'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4855540191312656294/comments/default/358684991751226303'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/visioconference-pre-eqe.html?showComment=1336985574073#c358684991751226303' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/visioconference-pre-eqe.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4855540191312656294' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4855540191312656294' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1382764611'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='14 mai 2012 10:52'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-8418486677457860343</id><published>2012-05-14T10:43:13.038+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-14T10:43:13.038+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Etant donné la facilité avec laquelle les différen...</title><summary type='text'>Etant donné la facilité avec laquelle les différentes parties le façonnent à leur manière lors d&amp;#39;une procédure d&amp;#39;examen ou d&amp;#39;opposition, ou un litige, je dirais que l&amp;#39;homme du métier n&amp;#39;est ni en bronze, ni en marbre: il doit être en argile ou même cire.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4580931618010938461/comments/default/8418486677457860343'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4580931618010938461/comments/default/8418486677457860343'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/quoi-peut-bien-ressembler-lhomme-du.html?showComment=1336984993038#c8418486677457860343' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/quoi-peut-bien-ressembler-lhomme-du.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4580931618010938461' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4580931618010938461' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1409295222'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='14 mai 2012 10:43'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-3436353881796959429</id><published>2012-05-14T10:28:00.558+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-14T10:28:00.558+02:00</updated><title type='text'>&lt;i&gt;A quoi peut-on attribuer la chute du nombre de ...</title><summary type='text'>&lt;i&gt;A quoi peut-on attribuer la chute du nombre de first sitters en 2013 ?&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Peut-être à cet examen? (Et alors il aurait bien servi à quelque chose...)</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4855540191312656294/comments/default/3436353881796959429'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4855540191312656294/comments/default/3436353881796959429'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/visioconference-pre-eqe.html?showComment=1336984080558#c3436353881796959429' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/visioconference-pre-eqe.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4855540191312656294' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4855540191312656294' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1409295222'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='14 mai 2012 10:28'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-1823517366570043581</id><published>2012-05-14T10:03:00.352+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-14T10:03:00.352+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Personnellement, plutôt que « l’homme du métier »,...</title><summary type='text'>Personnellement, plutôt que « l’homme du métier », je préfère « l’homme de lard » : un personnage qui n’est pas non plus en chaire et en os (puisqu’en lard on vous dit) mais que l’on peut accommoder à toutes les sauces (son côté artisan, voire artiste, sans doute) ; tandis qu’un homme du métier, surtout en bronze, cela me laisse de marbre.</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4580931618010938461/comments/default/1823517366570043581'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4580931618010938461/comments/default/1823517366570043581'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/quoi-peut-bien-ressembler-lhomme-du.html?showComment=1336982580352#c1823517366570043581' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/quoi-peut-bien-ressembler-lhomme-du.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4580931618010938461' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4580931618010938461' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-1607858981'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='14 mai 2012 10:03'/></entry><entry><id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-1111740974178979450</id><published>2012-05-14T09:10:28.627+02:00</published><updated>2012-05-14T09:10:28.627+02:00</updated><title type='text'>Je suis bien content de ne pas l&amp;#39;avoir passé é...</title><summary type='text'>Je suis bien content de ne pas l&amp;#39;avoir passé étant donné que je ne peux non plus ouvrir le fichier des résultats...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Concernant le taux de réussite, il faut dire que la qualité des tuteurs EQE explique tout ;-)</summary><link rel='edit' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4267352864901837461/comments/default/1111740974178979450'/><link rel='self' type='application/atom+xml' href='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/4267352864901837461/comments/default/1111740974178979450'/><link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/eqe-preliminaire-les-resultats.html?showComment=1336979428627#c1111740974178979450' title=''/><author><name>Anonymous</name><email>noreply@blogger.com</email><gd:image xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' rel='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005#thumbnail' width='16' height='16' src='http://img1.blogblog.com/img/blank.gif'/></author><thr:in-reply-to xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0' href='http://europeanpatentcaselaw.blogspot.com/2012/05/eqe-preliminaire-les-resultats.html' ref='tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7131801332744231802.post-4267352864901837461' source='http://www.blogger.com/feeds/7131801332744231802/posts/default/4267352864901837461' type='text/html'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.itemClass' value='pid-482622911'/><gd:extendedProperty xmlns:gd='http://schemas.google.com/g/2005' name='blogger.displayTime' value='14 mai 2012 09:10'/></entry></feed>
